Chapter 86: The Vote (1)


    The Brisotists were not ones to sit idle. Their proposal, in response to the events unfolding in France, was to expel all members of the Bourbon family from the country.


    This n wasn''t solely aimed at Louis XVI; it was more focused on the Duke of Orleans, who had renamed himself Philippe galit, and his son, the Duke of Chartres. They were currently aligned with the Robespierre faction. In the eyes of the Brisotists, Robespierre would undoubtedly support them, allowing them tobel the Duke of Orleans and his son as "royalists" or "conspirators against the Republic."


    However, times had changed, and the Duke of Orleans'' standing in the Jacobin Club had significantly dwindled. Though he had changed his name, the current leaders of the club knew that his true aim was not a republic but the Orleans monarchy. Even though they stood together now, they were not on the same path. Robespierre and his faction were unwilling to go to great lengths to defend them.


    The Duke of Orleans was aware of his declining position. To increase his influence, he sent his son, the Duke of Chartres (who was originally the only king in the historical Orleans monarchy, Louis Philippe I), with a group of armed volunteers he funded to join the forces of Danton. The Duke of Chartres performed well in the army, and in the reports returned by Danton, his name was frequently mentioned. However, some envious individuals suggested it was only because Danton took his money.


    The Duke of Orleans, or rather, "Philippe galit," as he was now called, could not afford another exile. The previous exile had inflicted heavy losses on him. The Brisotists, realizing that Robespierre and his faction wouldn''t speak on their behalf, took the initiative to propose the trial of King Louis XVI, or rather, the trial of Louis of Bourbon for treason. This way, while Louis XVI would likely lose his head, he wouldn''t be expelled.


    The Brisotists were well aware that the evidence was overwhelming, making it almost impossible for the King to be acquitted once he was put on trial. And if he were found guilty, the punishment for treason was only one: the guillotine.


    The question of whether to behead Louis XVI was not their primary concern, but they knew that such an action would lead to even more intense conflicts. The monarchies of Europe might unite to attack France, and within France, there would be no room forpromise between the conservatives and the republicans. Once the struggle escted, so-called "moderates" or "centrists" would be abandoned. Thus, from the Brisotists'' perspective, sending the King to the guillotine was equivalent to cing the radical Mountain faction or the conservative royalists on the throne of power.


    Since the Duke of Orleans couldn''t hold back the Mountain faction, the Brisotists had no choice but to involve all of Europe, potentially leading to a prolonged war to avoid the trial of the King.


    But as soon as this reason was brought up, the Robespierrians ridiculed it. After all, it was the Brisotists who had been pushing for war from the beginning, and now they suddenly cherished peace? Moreover, the earlier wars had demonstrated that the armies of the European feudal lords were not as formidable as they seemed. If they dared to intervene in France, it would only trigger a revolutionary response, leading to their downfall. By the way, that was something Brisot himself had said!


    In any case, Robespierre used Brisot''s own words to criticize him mercilessly. Typically, a politician''s most durable part is their face, and having their face tarnished doesn''t have much impact.


    However, the truly fatal consequence was the storm that arose in the Paris Commune.


    Since the departure of the Girondins from City Hall, the Paris Commune had fallen into the hands of the republicans. After the uprising on August 10th, the Mountain faction gained overwhelming dominance within the Paris Commune. During the September Massacres, many members of the Commune were somehow involved, and some even directly instigated and organized these acts of violence.


    After their victories on the front lines, the constitutional monarchists were defeated, and the Girondins intended to purge their former allies, the radical Mountain faction. One of their focal points was the Paris Commune because many members of the Commune could be implicated in the September Massacres.


    However, with the exposure of the "Safe Box" incident, the situation took aplete U-turn. Parisians had initially believed, through propaganda, that they or others had been overly zealous during the September Massacres. But as soon as these documents were revealed, their attitude shifted to, "If we hadn''t acted decisively, the Republic would have been lost!"


    Amidst such sentiments, the Girondins were immediately seen as royalists, trying to subvert the Republic by supporting a lenient approach and advocating clemency for the King. If the King were not put on trial, the Paris Commune might rise up again, with the citizens and National Guard joining another rebellion.


    In this situation, the National Convention had no choice but to decide on the trial of the King.


    On December 11th, Louis XVI appeared in court for the first time. He denied all the charges brought against him.


    Louis XVI''s defensewyer, Desechets, questioned the National Convention''s authority, saying, "ording to the Constitution, the National Convention has no right to try the King, as the Constitution stiptes that the King''s person is invible. If we insist on trying the King, it will lead to a problem. The issue is one of the legitimacy of the trial. Law is the foundation we must respect and rely on. If we vite thew today for this reason, we will vite it again tomorrow, and thew will be a dead letter. Our legal rights, including yours and mine, will no longer be protected..."


    This argument indeed resonated with some people, and they apuded him warmly.


    After the apuse died down, a young man stepped forward. He asked the host, "May I say a few words?"


    "Citizen, your name?" the host inquired.


    "Louis Antoine Lon Florel de Saint-Just, representing the department of Aisne," the young man replied with an air of grace.


    "Very well!" the host said. "Citizen Saint-Just, pleasee to the tform..."


    Saint-Just ascended the tform, surveyed the crowd, and began speaking:


    "The gentleman who spoke earlier gave a brilliant speech on legal matters. However, I believe he may have misunderstood the essence of this matter. Indeed, in terms of thew, the King cannot be tried. But what we are currently engaged in is not a legal case; it is a political event. Louis of Bourbon is not a defendant; he is an enemy. There is only onew that can be applied to him, and that is thew between nations, or in other words, thew of war. Louis was at war with the people. He has been conquered. He is a barbarian captive taken by us. He is a foreign prisoner of war! You already know of his treacherous schemes, you have seen his armies! He is the one who orchestrated the massacres at the Bastille, Nancy, the Champ de Mars, Tuileries, and Duillier, among others. Who else, what other enemy, what foreigner has caused you more harm?


    Certainly, in the eyes of thew, the King is invible, and thew, being of utmost importance, safeguards the rights of each and every one of us. Therefore, it must not be broken. However, esteemed gentlemen, do not forget that in the eyes of thew, there is another entity even more invible than the King, one that is supreme: the people of France! When Louis of Bourbon conspired with foreigners, when he plotted those horrifying betrayals and massacres that we all know of, he vited the supreme, invible entitythe people of France. From the moment Louis of Bourbonmitted this vition against the people of France, he ceased to be a king and became an enemy, an enemy of all of France..."


    Saint-Just walked down from the tform amid the apuse of the Mountain faction''s deputies and took his seat beside Robespierre.


    "Louis, your speech was excellent," Robespierre said, "and it has given me a lot of inspiration."


    "Well done, that was an amazing speech!" Danton added, "It''s hard to believe this is your first public address."


    "But my speech hasn''t changed their attitude," Saint-Just said, ncing to his right and continued, "They can''t defend the King because the people are not on their side."


    "Them? They can''t defend the King because the people are not on their side," Robespierre said confidently.


    In the following days, the National Convention engaged in several rounds of debate on how to handle the King. Robespierre delivered his famous speech, "Louis must die because the nation must live." His speech was immediately printed and widely circted by the Paris Commune. More and more people, spontaneously, gathered around the National Convention. When a deputy who supported sending the King to the guillotine passed by, the people cheered. When a deputy advocated clemency and mercy for the King, the crowd hissed and threw garbage at them.


    Time passed day by day, and the day of the vote finally arrived.


    "Joseph, how are you nning to vote?" one of the Brisotist deputies, the renowned philosopher Condorcet, asked Joseph Fouch, another deputy from their faction, as they both sat in a carriage on their way to the National Convention.


    "I will definitely vote for clemency," Fouch replied without hesitation. His gaze shifted through the carriage window, where a group of citizens had already erected a 1:1 scale model of a guillotine along the road leading to the National Convention...